Month: January 2025

Ignore Rob Manfred: lockouts exist to preempt strikes

Lockouts are a necessity for one thing only, and you’re not going to hear Rob Manfred say what that is.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

MLB commissioner Rob Manfred can say whatever he wants about the need for a lockout as something of a routine part of collective bargaining. And he certainly has, as evidenced by a recent interview with The Athletic’s Evan Drellich. A pertinent excerpt:

But one action looks virtually certain. Manfred said an offseason lockout, as there was in 2021-22, should be considered the new norm.

“In a bizarre way, it’s actually a positive,” he said. “There is leverage associated with an offseason lockout and the process of collective bargaining under the NLRA works based on leverage. The great thing about offseason lockouts is the leverage that exists gets applied between the bargaining parties.”

To which MLBPA executive director Tony Clark’s responded by saying that, “Players know from first-hand experience that a lockout is neither routine nor positive… It’s a weapon, plain and simple, implemented to pressure players and their families by taking away a player’s ability to work.”

Continue reading “Ignore Rob Manfred: lockouts exist to preempt strikes”

Orioles’ owner publicly wishes for salary cap

David Rubenstein spoke up about his wishes for a salary cap, which signals we should be watching to see if other owners start bringing it up, too.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

There’s been all kinds of talk in MLB lately about the need for a salary cap. There is no need at all, of course, given it’s attempting to solve a problem that doesn’t actually exist in more ways than one: there’s what Rob Mains pointed out last week at Baseball Prospectus, in that the competitive imbalance cited as evidence of the need for a salary cap doesn’t actually exist, and there’s also what I’ve been harping on for some time now, where the problem is not the teams like the Dodgers that are outspending everyone, but the huge chunk of the league that wasn’t spending enough years ago and isn’t spending more now even as other clubs do increase spending.

It keeps coming up, though, so let’s dive in again. Jeff Passan, over at ESPN, wrote a piece last week that included this bit that I want to highlight:

Continue reading “Orioles’ owner publicly wishes for salary cap”

Pirates want to win, just trust them, they’re good for it, say the Pirates

The Pirates are all words and no action, again.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

A thing I tell my kids all the time is that saying sorry is fine and all, but what matters is changing the behavior that led to having to apologize in the first place. Words are merely words without the actions to back them up, and an apology without this kind of change is nothing more than a plea for the offended party to stop being mad at the offender. An attempt to buy time, to change the subject.

The Pirates had their annual offseason fan fest over the weekend, and the main takeaway — whether from CEO Travis Williams or general manager Ben Cherington — is that the team is committed to winning. They want to win. They’re trying to build a winner. The most important thing is winning. Owner Bob Nutting isn’t in attendance and here to take your questions, no, but rest assured there’s nothing that man cares about more than winning. When asked if the team can extend young players like Oneil Cruz and Paul Skenes, Cherington responded with meaningless drivel about “creative ways” to keep the roster competitive, and that the most important way they can keep players in Pittsburgh is by winning.

Continue reading “Pirates want to win, just trust them, they’re good for it, say the Pirates”

US House’s trans sports ban is an attack on trans visibility

The proponents of these bills can say they’re about sports, or bathrooms, or safety, but that’s all pretext.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

It’s not about “fairness” in sports. It’s never been about fairness in sports. That might be what you hear coming out of the mouths of the Republican politicians who supported banning trans athletes from girl’s and women’s sports at every conceivable level with the a bill passed in the United States House of Representatives earlier this week, but those are just words. The point, as has been made elsewhere before and after the passing of this bill, is to alienate trans people, to demonize them, to push them out of society and into isolation.

There is no evidence that a trans girl or trans woman has some kind of advantage playing in sports leagues for girls and women, and it’s not because no one is looking for any. As Sydney Bauer recently put it in a piece you should take the time to read right now or after finishing this one, the reason for these “advantages” have to do with the idea that Men are Superior at sports, and therefore — due to both this perceived hierarchy and the transphobic belief that trans girls and trans women aren’t really girls or women, leads you straight to the patriarchal idea that they have some kind of advantage. You know, the same kind of attitude and belief system that allows some no-talent, zero-athleticism slob to believe that they’d be anything but a smoking crater after receiving a serve from Serena Williams, simply because they’re a man.

Continue reading “US House’s trans sports ban is an attack on trans visibility”

Mailbag request!

Not a mailbag, but a request for things to put in one.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Time for a mailbag? No! Time to ask for questions to put in (and then take out of) the mailbag? That’s the one. January is a pretty quiet month in the realm of baseball labor stories, when the players and the league aren’t in open war, at least. So what better time to put out a request for questions from you, the reader, than now?

This is how the mailbag usually works. If I receive a few smaller questions, I can bundle the answers together into a response article or two. If I get some questions requiring larger and more complex answers, though, those end up as standalone responses. So, feel free to go big, small, or anything in between: ask what’s on your mind, whether it’s topical or historical or just something that’s been nagging at you and related to the scope of this newsletter.

Continue reading “Mailbag request!”

Notes: Twins could sell soon, Rays write another letter

The Twins might have new owners soon, the Rays write another off-base letter, and there’s a fight among Padres owners that’s now in court.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

A real ownership-based version of the notes column today. Back in mid-October, it was reported that the Minnesota Twins were looking to sell, finally freeing the league from the Pohlads, a family that at one time was the wealthiest in the league — yes, even wealthier than George Steinbrenner back when he owned the Yankees — and has spent its decades in the game pretending that’s not true.

It’s just a few months later, but hey look at that, the Twins might even be sold by Opening Day in 2025, according to Dan Hayes at The Athletic. There’s a “robust market” per that report, so there are no concerns a deal can’t be put in place in the next few months. Which is funny, since if you ask a bunch of MLB owners about the business of owning a team, they’ll tell you that it’s not a good investment and not a place to make money. Famously, the wealthiest people around love to spend money on things that won’t make them a profit, so this is a confusing turn of events for those of us without critical thinking skills or a shred of skepticism to cling to.

Continue reading “Notes: Twins could sell soon, Rays write another letter”

Notes: Diamond isn’t Diamond now, an A’s reminder, Best of BP

A little holiday round-up to start the new year.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Happy New Year! Sure, that was a couple of days back, but this is the first Marvin Miller’s Mustache of 2025, so it’s fitting all the same. (Sometimes I forget that’s what I ended up naming this newsletter, too, so please enjoy this reminder if you’d forgotten about that change from last year.)

Let’s kick things off with some notes from the holiday break.

Continue reading “Notes: Diamond isn’t Diamond now, an A’s reminder, Best of BP”